This is another very short blog post but it does seem to follow on a bit from my last one about what to blog on which of my sites as this is another issue about what belongs where.
I had an Email enquiry the morning about the age ranges for different CORE measures and that was the latest in a small run of enquiries essentially on the same topic so I thought I’d better check up with some of the first papers about the measures and try to make sure I had a sensible answer that was congruent with those papers but also open for developments. That grew into a short document that was way too long for an FAQ as to colleagues confirmed when I checked with them (thanks JC & CP!) I now have a sensibly short FAQ on the topic but that begs some questions that will only apply for some people but may be behind the question from some people … so I have created a “Background and discussion documents” section on the site for short documents that are too large to be FAQ answers but are less discursive and personal than blog posts and aren’t proper papers (though I suspect that as time goes by, some may generate proper papers submitted to journals.
So welcome to the new section and the new FAQ and keep the questions and suggestions coming … but do remember I’m on this part time and unpaid and really appreciate it when people give me a bit of background to their requests.
Oh, and in that spirit of not letting things get too impersonal here: that image? Graffito in Toulouse where I am at the moment. Skip across to my personal blog for 29/2/20 to find out more but beware, that’s a very long blog post there.
I’ve just finished a blog post in my non-CORE-work site:
Ethics committees and the fear of questionnaires about distress.
It arose from an Email question that came to me here and it’s origins are in the GP-CORE, but in the end I decided the main content was personal and not CORE, but that it probably did have a right to a link from here, if only to signal how I’m trying to handle what belongs where.
OK. That’s all the legalistic stuff (and I, and we, do take data protection very seriously even though it ends up reading as very dull stuff), what about CORE? Well, CORE is thriving really though you wouldn’t know it from that Email list as that was the first time I’d actually sent a message there. Partly that’s because CORE is now keeping me busy 4-7 days a week with things that always seem to be more important than sending out an update.
The web site has been a problem as the man who owned the plugin we were using to serve up downloads seems to have disappeared and his plugin is broken. I have replaced the plugin and now have to rewrite every single one of the 93 download links which is very frustrating and only going slowly.
Various CORE measures, and all or part of the CORE-A, are still very widely used in the UK despite not being forced on services by the NHS: that has left us true to our philosophy that good routine change measurement is “bottom up”: driven by practitioners rather than “top down” driven managerially or politically. In other countries, particularly Italy and Spain, it’s also increasingly used within a number of “bottom up” developments that are very exciting and papers and reports that have used instruments and measures continue to emerge far faster than we can keep track of them. Most of my research time is taken up, as it has been for most of the last decade at least, with translations and psychometric explorations.
Now I really must get into a monthly rhythm of updates on the list and blog posts: there’s a positive spin off from making sure we’re GDPR compliant! If you’ve been caught up as a researcher in GDPR anxieties, I recommend Emily Blackshaw’s blog post: GDPR-related anxiety disorder (academic-type). She and I have had fun making ourselves 100% sure our YP-CORE work is fully GDPR compliant but it is!
Of the three of us, I’m responsible for the web site, most Email that come via the site, and all the translation work. Since our post on 7/7/16 I was very caught up in finishing my clinical post (permanently) at the end of July and then setting off on a trip of a lifetime: trying to cycle from London to Stantiago de Compostela in Spain. I had to sort out some nasty problems with the web site (WordPress is mostly great but some plugins we have had to use really aren’t) and do a number of pressing bits of translation related work. On my trip, having time, energy (it’s hard work cycling in the heat for all it’s a wonderful privilege!) and, above all, working IT/wifi/internet has been a nightmare and I have given first priority with that time to the pilgrimage site (www.psyctc.org/pelerinage2016/)
I am very sorry, but I am simply not going to be able to handle more than tiny CORE related things until my trip is over and I’m back at work: the first week of October. However, one reason for finally stopping clinical work was to make more time for CORE so I hope I will be able to make real inroads into the backlog when I do return. Apologies for now … but do have a look at the pilgrimage web site as it may amuse you and I do touch on important CORE and healthcare issues. I always hoped to have time to think about them properly like this.