I sent out an Email today to the 102 people signed up to the CST/CORE Email update list. This particular Email was triggered by the GDPR legislation and confirmed that I am 100% confident that everyone on the list gave their information to get on the list voluntarily so I/we (i.e. CST) have consent for […]
GPDR compliance and general update on CORE/CST work Read More »
Of the three of us, I’m responsible for the web site, most Email that come via the site, and all the translation work. Since our post on 7/7/16 I was very caught up in finishing my clinical post (permanently) at the end of July and then setting off on a trip of a lifetime: trying
Update on CST work by me (Chris Evans) Read More »
All three of us as CST trustees are deeply disappointed in the outcome of the referendum. As a part of a collective recovery from the vote, it seems important to make a statement about our position. CORE is tiny in terms of the impacts of “Brexit” on the UK and the EU, and the horrible
CST, CORE and the UK “Brexit” vote Read More »
The CORE-OM was the yield from a 3-year grant from the UK Mental Health Foundation, which started in 1995 and resulted in the launch of the CORE-OM and associated system in 1998. One question with all such developments is: what has been its impact? As those working in university settings will know, one index of
The CORE-OM and the h-index Read More »
The original commissioning specification for the CORE system required that the items in the measure covered domains of wellbeing (or “well being”, or “well-being”: there’s another naming issue!), problems/symptoms, functioning and risk. Â The questions were supposed, where possible to include intrapsychic ones and interpersonal ones and functioning was to cover both more personal/intimate and more
What’s in a name (2): domains, scales, scores, factors & dimensions Read More »
We may have caused a bit of confusion by introducing the term “Clinical score”. Perhaps it’s not on the scale of the Capulet/Montague name tragedy (Shakespeare, 1591-1995?) but it may be worth explaining the scoring here as I do see mistakes and do get asked about this. History We started out scoring using the mean
What’s in a name (1): scoring CORE measures Read More »
